August 3, 2010
Internet
Should YouTube users are allowed to tear the content they want their hard drives, like the one used by DVR recording television shows interesting? Believe some of the users that they should have this capability, and so on, they started a petition asking the right DVR important when using YouTube.
The petition is on the heels of the announcement that Google is after site-to-video conversion to mp3 with clear title, YouTube MP3.com, something that is reflected in the introduction to this solicitation:
For decades people are allowed to take a personal copy of the public broadcaster. You can record a program on the radio with a cassette recorder or make a copy of your favorite movies using a video recorder. All of these methods are heavily against the beginning of the year by the major media companies do not want the public to such technologies. They did describe the technology as a criminal and threatening their business.
Several years later, history repeating itself: Google has teamed up with the RIAA to make the same claim against all types of online recording tool in the 21th century broadcast their services: YouTube (“- broadcast yourself “). Google is taking action against almost every service that allows users to make personal copies of public broadcasting as the RIAA threatens YouTube news media like CNet to promote the software.
I hereby request Google to open their silence and participate in an open and fair discussion to find solutions that fit the needs of users.
It should be noted that while the consumer can record music from the radio or make a duplicate of the other tape to setup a dual-cassette, it is not necessary smiled on by force. In fact, the MPAA went all against technology videotape recorder (VCR). Difference is, the consumption of media in a very 80 one-way process, the consumer has little in the way of feedback. Sure, the occasional letter may be made capitalism work in your favor, but there’s certainly no way certain communications such as those offered by Facebook and Twitter.
With that in mind, the user should be to make a copy of the contents of YouTube, they are in the form of a video recording of the third phase of the software or through the tear site video soundtrack, convert them to MP3? While the comparison between the DVR and Internet Broadcast based on logic, it is not possible to see the current strength of siding to use it, especially when you consider the big fuss is made about the content provider YouTube in the past. Perhaps the balance struck that allows users to upload their own self-created content to give their viewers the option to download the file.
Moreover, it is difficult to see the day that the RIAA says “Sure, you can download the music you like from YouTube VEVO service, unless the song was first purchased by the viewer. As pointed out by GigaOm, the petition has over 180,000 signatures since installed three days earlier. While support is wonderful, it is hard to see it work in their favor.